Thursday, September 13, 2007

Post-Institutionalism

This article was originally published on Newsvine.com here to an audience of secularists, naturalists, hindus, etc. It is my deep feeling that what the world needs now are "post-Christian" followers of Christ.

A few years ago I really believed in the power of institutions. My experiences as a student, as an athlete, and as a church member were positive. Over time however, I have seen a rapid decline in the effectiveness of institutions with a corresponding increase in costs to manage. I began to notice that there were lots of people on the “outside” of these institutions. It would be easy to dismiss these “outsiders” as a fringe element, but the number of people who are losing out to institutionalism is growing at a rapid pace.

We often hail the greatness of our political, social, business, educational, and religious institutions. True greatness does not lie in building and protecting institutions, but in building and protecting people, families, and communities. Institutions stay “pure” by purging the “impure”. Families on the other hand, stay pure by integrating and building health and wholeness into each member.

The post-institutional era is about building organically through family and community structures with wholeness, collaboration, and good stewardship in mind.

Think about it. A political candidate thinks about issues in terms of reelection, not problem solving. A church starts a new marketing campaign to boost membership so that the budget will balance. Rather than thinking about building wholeness into individuals, they are thinking about institutional preservation. Business? Why is Google doing everything they can to avoid the institutional pitfalls that IBM and Microsoft have fallen into?

Close the Door Behind You

To demonstrate the “purge mentality” of institutions I will tell a quick story. In 2002, my family and I moved to Dallas, TX. Through the invitation of a neighbor we started attending a local church. The stated goal of the church was to provide a community for “healthy” families. I pondered that statement and wondered how many people that excluded from this community.

As time progressed I felt a need to serve in the church. I signed up to manage the parking lot before services and help seat people once they came inside. One Sunday, I was put in charge of the “overflow” section. If the front section of pews fills, a divider is pulled back and folding chairs are setup up to accommodate the “overflow”. In order to dissuade people from sitting in the overflow section prior to the front section filling, plastic tape was strung around the chairs barring entry. I was situated in front of the chairs to make sure no one sat in the overflow section until the appointed time.

I looked across the section of chairs to a young man who had jumped the tape blockade and taken a seat in the back row. This was an affront to the overflow section. Not only that… he was wearing an Ozzy Osbourne T-shirt! I walked over and sat down next to him. I said hello. He said hello in return. We talked for a while about how stupid it was to have an overflow section that was blocked off by tape. He could tell that I was “cool” and really didn’t care if he sat back there. He started telling me that he had fallen on rough times and that his parents had thrown him out of the house. I told him that sucked and it sounded very “unchristian”. He agreed. Right about that time, my neighbor (the one that invited us in the first place) came over and said, “mbrennan, what are you doing sitting in the reject section?” Nice… A couple minutes later, this older guy in a suit came over looking very embarrassed. Referring to my new Ozzy loving friend he said, “He’s probably high on God knows what!” It turns out that the old dude was Ozzy man’s dad. Nice… I said to the old guy, “Hey, we’re fine. We’re having a great conversation. Cool out.”

You see, Ozzy’s mom and dad were institutionalists. The institution had failed to reform their son so it was time to purge. They prayed to God that no one witnessed their unhealthy family. Shiny veneer with a black inside.

This was one of the great examples that showed me this truth. It bears repeating:

True greatness doesn’t lie in building and protecting institutions, but in building and protecting people, families, and communities. Institutions stay “pure” by purging the “impure”. Families stay pure by integrating and building wholeness in each member. The post-institutional era is about building organically through family and community structures with wholeness, collaboration, and good stewardship in mind.

So rather than building up Ozzy, we purged him.

Conclusions

So how will the post-institutional world impact you? Do you find yourself looking at problems that absolutely cannot be solved by the government or some other non-responsive institution? Have you noticed that the cost of health care and education are rising, but the quality is falling? There is no lack of intellectual capital, financial capital, and ingenuity to solve many of our problems. The question is are we willing to give ourselves to our own communities? Are we willing to engage our communities and bring non-institutional solutions to our most pressing problems? Many of us are stuck on the couch or by the computer decrying the failures of Washington, the UN, and the World Bank. At some point, the gross failures of institutions will lead to greater action among social entrepreneurs. Common citizens will take matters into their own hands. Some already have.

13 comments:

Joseph Holbrook said...

hey Matt, great post.

In some recent discussions, a friend pointed that that there is a difference between institutions and institutionalism. Institutions can be good, and are often necessary, but they should serve people -- not the other way around.

I have started several institutions...and found them much harder to end than to start. People often do try to shift their personal sense of responsability to the institution. A great example are youth groups and Sunday Schools in churches. Parents often love to shift the resonsability for spiritual formation of their children to the professionals, but it rarely bears good fruit.

mbrennan said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
mbrennan said...

In my story the villains are obviously the members. For me, it doesn't matter how wonderful institutions are at protecting families, educating kids, etc... if they are forsaking the task of making disciples to Jesus' way. The warning:

1 John 2:3-11

"Now by this we know that we know Him, if we keep His commandments. He who says, "I know Him," and does not keep His commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him. But whoever keeps His word, truly the love of God is perfected in him. By this we know that we are in Him. He who says he abides in Him ought himself also to walk just as He walked.

Brethren, I write no new commandment to you, but an old commandment which you have had from the beginning. The old commandment is the word which you heard from the beginning. Again, a new commandment I write to you, which thing is true in Him and in you, because the darkness is passing away, and the true light is already shining.

He who says he is in the light, and hates his brother, is in darkness until now. He who loves his brother abides in the light, and there is no cause for stumbling in him. But he who hates his brother is in darkness and walks in darkness, and does not know where he is going, because the darkness has blinded his eyes."

I know we all battle with the flesh and are working toward "the love of God being perfected in us", however our fellowship and gathering should be yeilding the fruit of love. Instead it is yeilding the fruit of "world hatred" and an endless seeking of emotional experiences of "worship". So it seems to be a very cut and dry issue. If we have institutions that get millions of people "saved" but 90+% of them do not love Jesus, their neighbor, and their enemy have we really done ANYTHING for the Kingdom?

If Jesus came to me and said, "I built relationships, not institutions. Are you willing to forsake institution building for the sake of making disciples?" I would say, "Yes Lord. Institutions have been beneficial to mankind, but no benefit is sufficient accept becoming ONE with You!"

We need to dump the good for the best. The scary thing is that our good institutions are keeping a lot of people from knowing Christ. This is grave.

Ruth Hillary said...

Wow.....this post seriously struck home for me. Joesph linked this in an email earlier this week and I jsut got around to reading it.

I actually teared up and cried a little when reading about "Ozzy"...throughout everyday I'm surrounded by hundreds of Ozzy's. The outcasts, the unwanted's, and unloved's. Funny part is, I'm one of them....not in the same way as many because I have actually come to a place of healing and love. But I will always be on the outside looking in.

I think that is because I'd rather be outside sharing real life, and real experiences with real people who are hurting deeply, than I would to go back to a place where I feel like i'm putting on a mask everyday and only showing people my outer shell. I also realize that institutions can be real, but alot of times even ones that start "real" have a hard time staying that way.

I think as humans we tend to "join the crowd", or institutions if u may to blend in. I mean when I'm standing in a crowd of 200, I'm less likely to stick out with all my problems, and differences. But My generation (and the ones just older and younger) don't want to hide....haha they WANT to be noticed.

Why do you think Tattoo's and Piercings have become so popular in our generation? We are tired of pretending to be something we are not, and want to stand out, stand up, and show everyone who we are, and how we are unique! Granted not everyone has the best intentions behind what they do....but at the core of it...I honestly think this is what it comes down to.

Sorry this got so long.....it touched something in me that I think I've carried around since I wanted to be that Ozzy....but was to afraid to be.

mbrennan said...

"I think that is because I'd rather be outside sharing real life, and real experiences with real people who are hurting deeply, than I would to go back to a place where I feel like i'm putting on a mask everyday and only showing people my outer shell."

That is powerful! I think it captures the cry of most people. REAL. Jesus was REAL.

Dr. Sam said...

Reminds me of Jesus' trying to tell the institutionalists that "people are more important than policies." He did so when they criticized the disciples for taking care of human needs versus keeping the law of the Sabbath. The "sabbath was made for man and not man for the sabbath."

Joseph Holbrook said...

very good illustration!
j

John M. said...

Matt, I resonate with what you're saying. It's interesting that my generation, who in their college years seemed to be so anti-institutional, went on to join the very institutions they decried or to form new ones of their own making.
When I read the title of your post it made me think of the "post-industrial" label of the last half of the 20th Century.

That which had been the driving force of the economy and society lost it's prominence and a lot of it's momentum -- but industrialism didn't go away -- its products were needed to fuel the modern age.

I think we are seeing a similar phenomenon at the beginning of the 21st Century -- the shift away from institutionalism that you so eloquently describe.

As the world continues to flatten, and the emerging culture becomes more organic and humanized (we hope!), the institutions will not go away, but will play a lesser role in the economy and the society at large.

Just as we still use the products of industry (while some at the same time strongly criticize it's environmental impact and it's treatment of workers), we will continue to use the services that modernity and institutions offer.
But, if the present trend continues, the organic, micro, local, and human needs-based ideas will eventually predominate.

Example of the above: When we need surgery or emergency care, we will still go to the large institution of the hospital; we will use the technology that modernism has created, and we will rely on machines and products that industry produces. Another example is the computers and the technology that we are using to communicate on this blog.

But notice that we are using the products of modernism, industrialism and institutionalism in a non-hierarchical, organic, relational, way. (Some will argue that non face-to-face communication is not relational, but I'm pretty sure it is -- at least to a point -- as long as the digital participants are honest and authentic and not into playing games.) And we are using these very institutionally/industrially produced products to discuss their passing influence.

This all has very important implications for the Church -- how it's governed, how/where it meets, the role (or not) of professional clergy (I strongly don't like that word, but it applies here.), etc.

Just as the non-institutional mindset and practice is emerging in society at large, it is also emerging in the Church. Time will tell how the latter 21st century Church will appear, but it;s safe to say that it will be quite different from what predominates today.

Will historians look back and see another Reformation -- this time not so much of doctrinal emphasis, but of church structure and church life? I personally think so and pray so. Unless the Church re-forms, she will not effectively touch the emerging generations.

As I write, it occurs to me that instead of a reformation, God may be creating something totally different which will not be recognizable as church as we know it. That idea excites me because it would be a place not just where the "Ozzies" are welcomed, it would be made of "Ozzies". Most likely, it will be a both/and thing.

God's Kingdom bigger than the church, it encompasses all of creation. It has a KING, but it is not an institution. The leaven is rising, the small seed is germinating. Lord, let your Kingdom come, let your will be done on earth as it is in heaven!

steve H said...

Matt, thanks for your post. Excellent and challenging. I have nothing to add except "God, help us!"

John M. said...

Ruth, your post grabbed my heart. Thanks for sharing yours with us. I enjoyed meeting some of those "real people"that you hang out with, when my wife and I visited recently. Keep the faith! Tell Mike I said, "Hi".

Gary said...

Matt's post makes some good points about an alternative approach to dependence upon institutionalism. His comments about the decreasing effectiveness matched with increasing costs, as well as his contrast of the processes used by insitutional entities compared to those of relational and organic entities seem quite true to me. "Integration" is God's way and is in keeping with His purpose as defined in Ephesians 1:9,10.

However, I believe the reference to a "post-institutional era" may reflect a naïveté mirrored in some of the emails discussing this issue in the chain begun by josenmiami. This probably reflects a wish-thought by those who believe they see a a credible alternative. I think it more realistic to understand that institutions have been a hallmark of civilization for thousands of years, and they are not likely to go away soon.

Some of them may diminish if and when a sufficient number of people mobilize for and prove a model of an organically based element in society which can effectively replace them. If and when society reaches that point, John M.'s comments may become true. "As the world continues to flatten, and the emerging culture becomes more organic and humanized (we hope!), the institutions will not go away, but will play a lesser role in the economy and the society at large."

While Dr. Sam correctly reminded us of Jesus reprimanding the instutionally minded Pharisees about the Sabbath, Jesus had a much higher authority on that issue than do we; He made the Sabbath, and knew that He did it for men.

My point is that we may waste a great deal of energy criticising institutionalism unless that is God's prophetic assignment for us. In fact, institutionalism is simply a belief or adherence to established forms, and attacking the belief systems of others is seldom productive nor is it becoming to a Believer. Confrontation seldom wins coverts, and often makes enemies. "A man convinced against his will is of the same mind still."

The most critical need at this strategic time in history is for Followers of Christ to recognize that Jesus was proclaiming and modeling The Kingdom of the Heavens which IS both spirit and organic in nature. When we recognize that, it is essential that we ACT upon it pro-actively by lovingly introducing them to Jesus and giving them some viable entry point into His Kingdom, rather than attack the people and institutions who may have yet to discover it. Can we produce some expression of the Life of Christ which people can form "a belief or adherence to . ."?

The greatest proof of an organic alternative to institutionalism is to produce one. "Alternative" means 'one instead of the other' or 'allowing or necessitating a choice between two or more things'
Source: Roget's New Millennium™ Thesaurus. "Allowing" a choice is almost certainly prefereable to "necessitating" one in an increasingly free world.

Many years of attempting to produce an alternative has impressed me that it is much more difficult to begin and sustain an organic model of "church' than it is to critique that which seems to be the less organic efforts of others.

Accordingly, may I suggest that we commit ourselves to a much greater effort to help one another learn how to actually live, work and build "organically" in our efforts to extend the offer of the Kingdom to others? Perhaps some realistic experiences of doing so, and/or proven models of the results will help some of us make a meaningful transition from this "institution" of Blogger to an organic expression of fruitfulness.

It seems that we may be aided at this time by the privilege of living among the increasing numbers of people who think in "post-modern" ways. Perhaps their presence and our access to them constitute the real kairos period so frequently mentioned?

If so, and assuming that we have received some genuine insight from God on organic fellowship, it would appear that we have no need to wait for any special "moment" in the future, but to begin to pro-actively DO all that He taught His disciples to DO.

Ruth Hillary said...

There is an organic alternative (not that i'm attacking the institution), down here in Homestead we have been living in a 'community' and though it has its problems it models more closely the 'church' during the time of Jesus' life.

Jesus attended the synagoge and listened to the teachings of the priests in them. However his 'church' if u want to call it that was his disciples. Did they meet weekly to pray and worship? Nope it was a daily happening in their lives. They didn't go to a building and do these things...they did them on hilltops, sea side, in the city, in the country. Jesus even spoke and taught in the presence of tax collectors, drunks, and prostitutes (wow makes me think of my job at the bar haha).

For a scriptural reference we can look in Acts at the early church:

"They devoted themselves to the apostles' teaching and to the fellowship, to the breaking of bread, and to prayer"..."All the believers were together and had everything in common."

Acts 2:42&44

I honestly don't think that anyone here is dissing the institution of the church. I think it is more of trying to figure out what will work to reach the younger generations (I could be wrong). This is the thing, most of my generation and younger feel like or are outcasts, misfits, and nonconformists. We don't fit anywhere lol!

Steve Jenkins tried to start a group for the young people when he was still here, unfortunately non of us were dedicated enough to help him keep it going. But there is deffinately something that has stayed with me.

There was one night I saw something about our generation. I saw everyone in the room that night as a odd shaped puzzle piece, and somehow we fit together. we wouldn't fit in any puzzle, and the one we did fit in, wasn't really a puzzle. It never ended, there were no flat pieces, it just went on and on....and it was becoming a beautiful masterpiece.

I'm not saying to do away with the institution of church here, but I am saying that to reach our generation, people may have to look beyond the institution. I'm sorry but the majority of us reject institutions and traditions, and to reach us one may have to go to the local bar (dad ;P ), the local Unniversity, etc...

Times change, and to continue to grow and live institutions must change and adapt. If they don't....they die out over time. Not a judgement just what happens.

P.S. John M. Thanks! I really enjoyed getting to see you both =) and I'm glad u got to step a little further outside of the box while u were here hehe. You should come visit more often!

John M. said...

Hey Ruth! I'd love to; if you can figure out how to do it free, I'm sure I'll show up more often! Wish I could have been there Friday night for the Birthday party. Glad Sam made it.

I resonate with a lot that's being said here -- especially Matt's description of what is "church" for him. I can identify with much of what you're saying there Matt.

Sam, it's been eight years since I broke out of the traditional salaried pastor box. I wouldn't go back for any amount of money.